Post by Bartonite on May 12, 2017 14:38:33 GMT
I've taken the advice that a minor (to me, at any rate) spat I've been having with an individual on the Gloucestershire boards shouldn't continue to take up anyone else's time there. I don't really expect Paul Harries to pursue the [discussion/debate/argument? Take your pick] here, but at least he won't have the excuse to keep accusing me of criminal activities over there...
Paul Harries is good at ignoring things. He's ignored the fact that he only decided I'd committed 'trespass', during one or all the of three conversations I had with him on his doorstep, after he threw an eppy when I suggested (again, after these conversations, with no apparent ire on either side), quite mildly, but in my opinion quite accurately, that he had not accomplished very much in his time as a committee member on the Barton & Tredworth Neighbourhood Partnership. This was a community organisation (kind of a residents' association with delusions of grandeur) that he also failed to keep from being dissolved at the end of last December. It turns out that he recollects not convivial conversations, but him asking me to leave, and me refusing, something he then went on to tell the local police, leading to them turning up on my doorstep with a [personal notice?], warning me of possible consequences of doing the thing I hadn't done in the first place.
Paul Harries has also accused me of trespassing at the Barton Community Centre, by sitting outside a BTNP waiting to speak to the committee, and trying to set up a 'competing partnership'. The link is to the post containing all these accusations. In hindsight, the last, most bizarre one, may be down to a misinterpration of an earlier post in that thread, where I said I was trying to set up, not an AGM, but a local meeting to discuss the dissolution. It's the kind of confusion that seems to have led Paul Harries to construct an elaborate mental image of my diabolical activities which he now can't see past. He won't say anything, despite several requests to do so, about a 'subsequent meeting to confirm the dissolution' and whether it was publicly advertised, nor of why the dissolution has never been announced, some eight months later but somehow, everything is my fault.
I don't expect him to say anything here, either, and so the matter (of his accusations, anyway) should rest.
Hi
I've tried to ignore the personal digs that Mr Kilker seems to spit out. He's ignoring the fact that he'd committed trespass. Hoped the thread would be shut down completely, so we could get back to the debate. (Please)?
Thanks
Paul Harries
I've tried to ignore the personal digs that Mr Kilker seems to spit out. He's ignoring the fact that he'd committed trespass. Hoped the thread would be shut down completely, so we could get back to the debate. (Please)?
Thanks
Paul Harries
Paul Harries is good at ignoring things. He's ignored the fact that he only decided I'd committed 'trespass', during one or all the of three conversations I had with him on his doorstep, after he threw an eppy when I suggested (again, after these conversations, with no apparent ire on either side), quite mildly, but in my opinion quite accurately, that he had not accomplished very much in his time as a committee member on the Barton & Tredworth Neighbourhood Partnership. This was a community organisation (kind of a residents' association with delusions of grandeur) that he also failed to keep from being dissolved at the end of last December. It turns out that he recollects not convivial conversations, but him asking me to leave, and me refusing, something he then went on to tell the local police, leading to them turning up on my doorstep with a [personal notice?], warning me of possible consequences of doing the thing I hadn't done in the first place.
Paul Harries has also accused me of trespassing at the Barton Community Centre, by sitting outside a BTNP waiting to speak to the committee, and trying to set up a 'competing partnership'. The link is to the post containing all these accusations. In hindsight, the last, most bizarre one, may be down to a misinterpration of an earlier post in that thread, where I said I was trying to set up, not an AGM, but a local meeting to discuss the dissolution. It's the kind of confusion that seems to have led Paul Harries to construct an elaborate mental image of my diabolical activities which he now can't see past. He won't say anything, despite several requests to do so, about a 'subsequent meeting to confirm the dissolution' and whether it was publicly advertised, nor of why the dissolution has never been announced, some eight months later but somehow, everything is my fault.
I don't expect him to say anything here, either, and so the matter (of his accusations, anyway) should rest.